GitHub Actions: Add Julia 1.7, remove 1.4 and 1.5

.github/workflows/test.yml

@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ jobs:
     runs-on: ${{ matrix.os }}
     strategy:
       matrix:
-        julia-version: ['1.4', '1.5', '1.6']
+        julia-version: ['1.6', '1.7']
         julia-arch: [x64]
         os: [ubuntu-latest, windows-latest, macOS-latest]
         exclude:

benchmark/run.jl

@@ -126,9 +126,13 @@ formulations = Dict(
 
 # Solution methods
 # -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
+const gap_limit = parse(Float64, args["--gap"])
+const time_limit = parse(Float64, args["--time-limit"])
 methods = Dict(
-    "default" =>
-        XavQiuWanThi2019.Method(time_limit = 3600.0, gap_limit = 1e-4),
+    "default" => XavQiuWanThi2019.Method(
+        time_limit = time_limit,
+        gap_limit = gap_limit,
+    ),
 )
 
 # MIP solvers
@@ -154,8 +158,6 @@ end
 if !isempty(args["--solver"])
     optimizers = filter(p -> p.first in args["--solver"], optimizers)
 end
-const time_limit = parse(Float64, args["--time-limit"])
-const gap_limit = parse(Float64, args["--gap"])
 const ntrials = parse(Int, args["--trials"])
 
 # Print benchmark settings

docs/instances.md

@@ -9,12 +9,11 @@ suffix: .
 Instances
 =========
 
-UnitCommitment.jl provides a large collection of benchmark instances collected
-from the literature and converted to a [common data format](format.md). In some cases, as indicated below, the original instances have been extended, with realistic parameters, using data-driven methods. 
-If you use these instances in your research, we request that you cite UnitCommitment.jl, as well as the original sources.
+UnitCommitment.jl provides a large collection of benchmark instances collected from the literature and converted to a [common data format](format.md). In some cases, as indicated below, the original instances have been extended, with realistic parameters, using data-driven methods. If you use these instances in your research, we request that you cite UnitCommitment.jl, as well as the original sources, as listed below. Benchmark instances can be loaded with `UnitCommitment.read_benchmark(name)`, as explained in the [usage section](usage.md).
 
-Raw instances files are [available at our GitHub repository](https://github.com/ANL-CEEESA/UnitCommitment.jl/tree/dev/instances). Benchmark instances can also be loaded with
-`UnitCommitment.read_benchmark(name)`, as explained in the [usage section](usage.md).
+```{warning}
+The instances included in UC.jl are still under development and may change in the future. If you use these instances in your research, for reproducibility, you should specify what version of UC.jl they came from.
+```
 
 
 MATPOWER
@@ -43,15 +42,10 @@ A variety of smaller IEEE test cases, [compiled by University of Washington](htt
 | Name | Buses | Generators | Lines | Contingencies | References |
 |------|-------|------------|-------|---------------|--------|
 | `matpower/case14/2017-02-01` | 14 | 5 | 20 | 19 | [MTPWR, PSTCA]
-| `matpower/case14/2017-08-01` | 14 | 5 | 20 | 19 | [MTPWR, PSTCA]
 | `matpower/case30/2017-02-01` | 30 | 6 | 41 | 38 | [MTPWR, PSTCA]
-| `matpower/case30/2017-08-01` | 30 | 6 | 41 | 38 | [MTPWR, PSTCA]
 | `matpower/case57/2017-02-01` | 57 | 7 | 80 | 79 | [MTPWR, PSTCA]
-| `matpower/case57/2017-08-01` | 57 | 7 | 80 | 79 | [MTPWR, PSTCA]
 | `matpower/case118/2017-02-01` | 118 | 54 | 186 | 177 | [MTPWR, PSTCA]
-| `matpower/case118/2017-08-01` | 118 | 54 | 186 | 177 | [MTPWR, PSTCA]
 | `matpower/case300/2017-02-01` | 300 | 69 | 411 | 320 | [MTPWR, PSTCA]
-| `matpower/case300/2017-08-01` | 300 | 69 | 411 | 320 | [MTPWR, PSTCA]
 
 
 ### MATPOWER/Polish
@@ -61,21 +55,13 @@ Test cases based on the Polish 400, 220 and 110 kV networks, originally provided
 | Name | Buses | Generators | Lines | Contingencies | References |
 |------|-------|------------|-------|---------------|--------|
 | `matpower/case2383wp/2017-02-01` | 2383 | 323 | 2896 | 2240 | [MTPWR]
-| `matpower/case2383wp/2017-08-01` | 2383 | 323 | 2896 | 2240 | [MTPWR]
 | `matpower/case2736sp/2017-02-01` | 2736 | 289 | 3504 | 3159 | [MTPWR]
-| `matpower/case2736sp/2017-08-01` | 2736 | 289 | 3504 | 3159 | [MTPWR]
 | `matpower/case2737sop/2017-02-01` | 2737 | 267 | 3506 | 3161 | [MTPWR]
-| `matpower/case2737sop/2017-08-01` | 2737 | 267 | 3506 | 3161 | [MTPWR]
 | `matpower/case2746wop/2017-02-01` | 2746 | 443 | 3514 | 3155 | [MTPWR]
-| `matpower/case2746wop/2017-08-01` | 2746 | 443 | 3514 | 3155 | [MTPWR]
 | `matpower/case2746wp/2017-02-01` | 2746 | 457 | 3514 | 3156 | [MTPWR]
-| `matpower/case2746wp/2017-08-01` | 2746 | 457 | 3514 | 3156 | [MTPWR]
 | `matpower/case3012wp/2017-02-01` | 3012 | 496 | 3572 | 2854 | [MTPWR]
-| `matpower/case3012wp/2017-08-01` | 3012 | 496 | 3572 | 2854 | [MTPWR]
 | `matpower/case3120sp/2017-02-01` | 3120 | 483 | 3693 | 2950 | [MTPWR]
-| `matpower/case3120sp/2017-08-01` | 3120 | 483 | 3693 | 2950 | [MTPWR]
 | `matpower/case3375wp/2017-02-01` | 3374 | 590 | 4161 | 3245 | [MTPWR]
-| `matpower/case3375wp/2017-08-01` | 3374 | 590 | 4161 | 3245 | [MTPWR]
 
 ### MATPOWER/PEGASE
 
@@ -84,15 +70,10 @@ Test cases from the [Pan European Grid Advanced Simulation and State Estimation
 | Name | Buses | Generators | Lines | Contingencies | References |
 |------|-------|------------|-------|---------------|--------|
 | `matpower/case89pegase/2017-02-01` | 89 | 12 | 210 | 192 | [JoFlMa16, FlPaCa13, MTPWR]
-| `matpower/case89pegase/2017-08-01` | 89 | 12 | 210 | 192 | [JoFlMa16, FlPaCa13, MTPWR]
 | `matpower/case1354pegase/2017-02-01` | 1354 | 260 | 1991 | 1288 | [JoFlMa16, FlPaCa13, MTPWR]
-| `matpower/case1354pegase/2017-08-01` | 1354 | 260 | 1991 | 1288 | [JoFlMa16, FlPaCa13, MTPWR]
 | `matpower/case2869pegase/2017-02-01` | 2869 | 510 | 4582 | 3579 | [JoFlMa16, FlPaCa13, MTPWR]
-| `matpower/case2869pegase/2017-08-01` | 2869 | 510 | 4582 | 3579 | [JoFlMa16, FlPaCa13, MTPWR]
 | `matpower/case9241pegase/2017-02-01` | 9241 | 1445 | 16049 | 13932 | [JoFlMa16, FlPaCa13, MTPWR]
-| `matpower/case9241pegase/2017-08-01` | 9241 | 1445 | 16049 | 13932 | [JoFlMa16, FlPaCa13, MTPWR]
 | `matpower/case13659pegase/2017-02-01` | 13659 | 4092 | 20467 | 13932 | [JoFlMa16, FlPaCa13, MTPWR]
-| `matpower/case13659pegase/2017-08-01` | 13659 | 4092 | 20467 | 13932 | [JoFlMa16, FlPaCa13, MTPWR]
 
 ### MATPOWER/RTE
 
@@ -101,21 +82,13 @@ Test cases from the R&D Division at [Reseau de Transport d'Electricite](https://
 | Name | Buses | Generators | Lines | Contingencies | References |
 |------|-------|------------|-------|---------------|--------|
 | `matpower/case1888rte/2017-02-01` | 1888 | 296 | 2531 | 1484 | [MTPWR, JoFlMa16]
-| `matpower/case1888rte/2017-08-01` | 1888 | 296 | 2531 | 1484 | [MTPWR, JoFlMa16]
 | `matpower/case1951rte/2017-02-01` | 1951 | 390 | 2596 | 1497 | [MTPWR, JoFlMa16]
-| `matpower/case1951rte/2017-08-01` | 1951 | 390 | 2596 | 1497 | [MTPWR, JoFlMa16]
 | `matpower/case2848rte/2017-02-01` | 2848 | 544 | 3776 | 2242 | [MTPWR, JoFlMa16]
-| `matpower/case2848rte/2017-08-01` | 2848 | 544 | 3776 | 2242 | [MTPWR, JoFlMa16]
 | `matpower/case2868rte/2017-02-01` | 2868 | 596 | 3808 | 2260 | [MTPWR, JoFlMa16]
-| `matpower/case2868rte/2017-08-01` | 2868 | 596 | 3808 | 2260 | [MTPWR, JoFlMa16]
 | `matpower/case6468rte/2017-02-01` | 6468 | 1262 | 9000 | 6094 | [MTPWR, JoFlMa16]
-| `matpower/case6468rte/2017-08-01` | 6468 | 1262 | 9000 | 6094 | [MTPWR, JoFlMa16]
 | `matpower/case6470rte/2017-02-01` | 6470 | 1306 | 9005 | 6085 | [MTPWR, JoFlMa16]
-| `matpower/case6470rte/2017-08-01` | 6470 | 1306 | 9005 | 6085 | [MTPWR, JoFlMa16]
 | `matpower/case6495rte/2017-02-01` | 6495 | 1352 | 9019 | 6060 | [MTPWR, JoFlMa16]
-| `matpower/case6495rte/2017-08-01` | 6495 | 1352 | 9019 | 6060 | [MTPWR, JoFlMa16]
 | `matpower/case6515rte/2017-02-01` | 6515 | 1368 | 9037 | 6063 | [MTPWR, JoFlMa16]
-| `matpower/case6515rte/2017-08-01` | 6515 | 1368 | 9037 | 6063 | [MTPWR, JoFlMa16]
 
 
 PGLIB-UC Instances

instances/README.md

@@ -1,53 +0,0 @@
-Instances
-=========
-
-UnitCommitment.jl provides a large collection of benchmark instances collected
-from the literature and converted to a common data format. If you use these instances in your research, we request that you cite UnitCommitment.jl, as well as the original sources, as listed below. [See documentation for more details](https://anl-ceeesa.github.io/UnitCommitment.jl/).
-
-References
-----------
-
-### UnitCommitment.jl
-
-* [UCJL] **Alinson S. Xavier, Feng Qiu.** "UnitCommitment.jl: A Julia/JuMP Optimization Package for Security-Constrained Unit Commitment". Zenodo (2020). [DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4269874](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4269874)
-
-
-### MATPOWER
-
-* [MTPWR] **D. Zimmerman, C. E. Murillo-Sandnchez and R. J. Thomas.** "Matpower:  Steady-state  operations,  planning,  and  analysis  tools  forpower systems research and education", IEEE Transactions on PowerSystems, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 12 –19, Feb. 2011. [DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2010.2051168](https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2010.2051168)
-
-* [PSTCA] **University of Washington, Dept. of Electrical Engineering.** "Power Systems Test Case Archive". Available at: <http://www.ee.washington.edu/research/pstca/> (Accessed: Nov 14, 2020)
-
-* [JoFlMa16] **C. Josz, S. Fliscounakis, J. Maeght, and P. Panciatici.** "AC Power Flow
-Data in MATPOWER and QCQP Format: iTesla, RTE Snapshots, and PEGASE". [ArXiv (2016)](https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.01533).
-
-* [FlPaCa13] **S. Fliscounakis, P. Panciatici, F. Capitanescu, and L. Wehenkel.**
-"Contingency ranking with respect to overloads in very large power
-systems taking into account uncertainty, preventive and corrective
-actions", Power Systems, IEEE Trans. on, (28)4:4909-4917, 2013.
-[DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2013.2251015](https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2013.2251015)
-
-
-### PGLIB-UC
-
-* [PGLIB] **Carleton Coffrin and Bernard Knueven.** "Power Grid Lib - Unit Commitment". Available at: <https://github.com/power-grid-lib/pglib-uc> (Accessed: Nov 14, 2020)
-
-* [KrHiOn12] **Eric Krall, Michael Higgins and Richard P. O’Neill.** "RTO unit commitment test system." Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Available at: <https://www.ferc.gov/industries-data/electric/power-sales-and-markets/increasing-efficiency-through-improved-software-1> (Accessed: Nov 14, 2020)
-
-* [KnOsWa20] **Bernard Knueven, James Ostrowski and Jean-Paul Watson.** "On Mixed-Integer Programming Formulations for the Unit Commitment Problem". INFORMS Journal on Computing (2020). [DOI: 10.1287/ijoc.2019.0944](https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2019.0944)
-
-### RTS-GMLC
-
-* https://github.com/GridMod/RTS-GMLC
-
-* [BaBlEh19] **Clayton Barrows, Aaron Bloom, Ali Ehlen, Jussi Ikaheimo, Jennie Jorgenson, Dheepak Krishnamurthy, Jessica Lau et al.** "The IEEE Reliability Test System: A Proposed 2019 Update." IEEE Transactions on Power Systems (2019). [DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2019.2925557](https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2019.2925557)
-
-### OR-LIB
-
-* [ORLIB] **J.E.Beasley.** "OR-Library: distributing test problems by electronic mail", Journal of the Operational Research Society 41(11) (1990). [DOI: 10.2307/2582903](https://doi.org/10.2307/2582903)
-
-* [FrGe06] **A. Frangioni, C. Gentile.** "Solving nonlinear single-unit commitment problems with ramping constraints" Operations Research 54(4), p. 767 - 775, 2006. [DOI: 10.1287/opre.1060.0309](https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1060.0309)
-
-### Tejada19
-
-* [TeLuSa19] **D. A. Tejada-Arango, S. Lumbreras, P. Sanchez-Martin and A. Ramos.** "Which Unit-Commitment Formulation is Best? A Systematic Comparison," in IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. [DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2019.2962024](https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8941313/).